Skip to main content

CastleWindsor issue with MVC Area

I have been stuck with this issue and couldn't take it out of my head. Hence, ended up putting in some heavy hours solving it. But hopefully it is worth it.

THE CONTEXT:

I am implementing a MVC solution for an existing Sitecore 8.0 implementation which uses Castle Windsor for it's dependency resolver. Let's say a a tiny microsite. I had to implement a SPEAK app as per one of the requirements. Below are the 2 most important things behind why I ran into this issue in the first place:

I needed to call a WebApi from my SPEAK app.
2. I decided to take MVC Area approach for my "tiny microsite" on a completely different sets of dlls

For example the dlls for my "tiny microsite" are MyTinyApp.Web.dll, MyTinyApp.Business.dll whereas the main website's dlls are BigWebsite.Web.dll, BigWebsite.Business.dll etc. 


WHY MVC AREA:

The reason I took the MVC Area approach was to completely separate my "tiny microsite" so that I don't have to touch any of the code from "BigWebsite" implementation (Or it can also be that the code base for the "Big Website" was unavailable to me .. imagine whatever floats your boat).


THE PROBLEM:

After I implemented my MVC Area project on dll called "MyTinyApp.Web.dll" for my "tiny microsite) upon trying to call the WebApi I started getting bellow error:



From the error it's clear that the routing got resolved without any issue. But Castle Windsor for some weird reason decided to step in like "hai .. new controller .. i need to resolve this" which I would be cool with until it couldn't and threw the bizarre error that doen't make sense to begin with. 

I have never told Castle Windsor to resolve any of my stuff for "MyTinyApp.Web.dll" and the exception was getting thrown from BigWebsite.Web.dll. 

WEIRD.


THE SOLUTION:

1. Create a processor in one of your project specific config file like below:


<pipelines>
      <initialize>
                               <processor patch:before="processor[@type='Sitecore.Mvc.Pipelines.Loader.InitializeGlobalFilters, Sitecore.Mvc']" type="MyTinyApp.CastleWindsor.Pipelines.Initialize.InitializeWindsorControllerFactory, MyTinyApp.CastleWindsor" />
     </initialize>

 </pipelines>

2. Create a settings to get the assembly name associated with Big Website's dependency resolver.

  <setting name="BigWebsiteDependancyResolverAssembly" value="BigWebsite.Web.DependencyResolution.ContainerManager,BigWebsite.Web" />

3. Implement the ControllerFactory for TinyApp:


public class InitializeWindsorControllerFactory
    {
        public virtual void Process(PipelineArgs args)
        {
            string assemblyAndClass = ConfigHelper.GetValue("BigWebsiteDependancyResolverAssembly");
                Type resolverType = Type.GetType(assemblyAndClass);
                IWindsorContainer icontainer = (IWindsorContainer)(resolverType.GetProperty("Container").GetValue(null));

                icontainer.Register(Classes.FromAssemblyNamed("oblog.client.mvc").BasedOn<IController>().LifestyleTransient());
        }

    }

And waalaaa .. Double Rainbow and Unicorn,



The trick here was to get it through reflection.

Thus I do not have to touch the BigWebsite codebase at all so I can avoid deployment headache for it. Resolving though reflection makes it completely independent to any other dlls.  

"This is mainly intended for future me." but seriously CastleWindsor WTF !!!!



UPDATE:



So one of my genius colleagues figured out that original implementation of ControllerFactory in BigWebsite.Web project(csproj) had flaw in it. 

Here's his post:


So it was originally like below:

public class WindsorControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
    {
        private readonly IKernel kernel;

        public WindsorControllerFactory(IKernel kernel)
        {
            this.kernel = kernel;
        }

        public override void ReleaseController(IController controller)
        {
            kernel.ReleaseComponent(controller);
        }

        protected override IController GetControllerInstance(RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType)
        {
            if (controllerType == null)
            {
                throw new HttpException(404, string.Format("The controller for path '{0}' could not be found.", requestContext.HttpContext.Request.Path));
            }

            return (IController)kernel.Resolve(controllerType);
        }

    }

Because of this line in the implementation of the ContainerManager class which you put in the initialize pipeline:
container.Install(FromAssembly.InDirectory(new AssemblyFilter(Path.GetDirectoryName(Uri.UnescapeDataString((new UriBuilder(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().CodeBase)).Path)), "BigWebsite*.dll")));
the described error was getting thrown from this line :  
return (IController)kernel.Resolve(controllerType);

Weirdly, most of the blog/tutorials show this example for implementing Castle Windsor for MVC.
The fix is to have this instead:
try
            {
                return (IController)kernel.Resolve(controllerType);
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                // do something
                return base.GetControllerInstance(requestContext, controllerType);

            }

And everything else works fine from here. No need to implement extra pipeline to inject you "mvc area" implementation dll into the pipeline or modify existing implementation.


Hope it helps someone facing the same issue save time so that he/she can utilize it properly to dress up like wookie.

  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The story of a Hack Job

"So, you have hacked it" -- Few days ago one of the guys at work passed me this comment on a random discussion about something I built. I paused for a moment and pondered: Do I reply defending how that's not a hack. OR Do I just not bother I picked the second option for 2 reasons: It was late. It probably isn't worth defending the "hack vs" topic as the comment passed was out of context. So I chose the next best action and replied "Yep, sure did and it is working great.". I felt like Batman in the moment. In this post I will rant about the knowledge gap around hacking and then describe about one of the components of my home automation project (really, this is the main reason for this post) and use that as an example how hacking is cool and does not always mean bad. But first lets align on my definition of hacking: People use this term in good and bad, both ways. For example: "He/she did a hack job" -- Yeah, that probably...

Kubectl using SSH tunnel for TKG K8s Clusters

We know SSH'ing and probably many knows about SSH tunnel. The way, in my opinion, these 2 (SSH and SSH tunnel) are different to me (and I am in favor of SSH Tunnel) is how I use it. From tooling perspective I would almost always do tunnel instead of direct ssh.  In this post I will describe how to do SSH tunnel for kubectl to interact with remote kubernetes cluster (Specifically Tanzu Kubernetes Grid aka TKG cluster). Get the project ready to go from my github:  https://github.com/alinahid477/vsphere-with-tanzu-wizard Topics Backstory SSH tunnel for TKG Clusters using Docker container Technical stuff: Tunnel through Bastion for TKG K8s cluster Technical stuff: SSH Tunnel for Kubectl for remote K8s Clusters (same with or without docker) Technical stuff: Explain me this A famous quote from Darth Vader himself: "Feel the power of SSH Tunnel" Backstory Why ssh or ssh tunnel? The below diagram shows in what scenario a SSH or SSH Tunnel almost becomes a necessity. Let's st...

CKA Exam; May 2024: My take on it and cheat sheet

So, I finally got the little green tick of having CKA certification in my certification list. I put off this exam for so long that it seriously became not funny anymore. The internet has quite literally way more than 1000 posts on this topic. But what harm would one more post cause? So here's mine. I will write it from my perspective. I am writing this post just in case if anyone benefits from it, as I predict there could be many on the same boat as me. Background: Kubernetes, modern application architecture, DevSecOps etc are not new territory for me. In fact, I think I am fairly versed in K8s and related tech stack. But due my own imposter syndrome I have been putting off sitting the CKA exam. However, last week I thought about the CKA as "just another approval for my skills" and got the nudge to sit the exam.  Here's what I did till the day I sat for the exam. (Everybody is different but the below worked for me the best) The preparation: As I have been working with...

A CQRS Microservice Architecture - My Way

Microservice Architecture is the new trend in the industry. When I thought of building a decisioning engine to work as my personal assistant I decided to design it as a swarm of Microservices. The most compelling selling point about Microservice Architecture which resonated well for me was its ease of maintainability and that's a big factor for a hobby project like this which has a lot of custom logic programmed into it and requires a lot of frequent changes. In theory, Microservice should fit right in. I tried doing it in the Monolithic way and I failed !!. So, will Microservices solve it for me? Let's find out. In this post I will do it in the "Software Engineering" way. Background: Few weeks ago I created a wifi controlled water system that I can control via my Home Assistant (using my phone even if I am on the other side of the planet, like Batman). And this is working great for me. Read about that here: Smart wifi controlled irrigation system . Bu...