Skip to main content

CastleWindsor issue with MVC Area

I have been stuck with this issue and couldn't take it out of my head. Hence, ended up putting in some heavy hours solving it. But hopefully it is worth it.

THE CONTEXT:

I am implementing a MVC solution for an existing Sitecore 8.0 implementation which uses Castle Windsor for it's dependency resolver. Let's say a a tiny microsite. I had to implement a SPEAK app as per one of the requirements. Below are the 2 most important things behind why I ran into this issue in the first place:

I needed to call a WebApi from my SPEAK app.
2. I decided to take MVC Area approach for my "tiny microsite" on a completely different sets of dlls

For example the dlls for my "tiny microsite" are MyTinyApp.Web.dll, MyTinyApp.Business.dll whereas the main website's dlls are BigWebsite.Web.dll, BigWebsite.Business.dll etc. 


WHY MVC AREA:

The reason I took the MVC Area approach was to completely separate my "tiny microsite" so that I don't have to touch any of the code from "BigWebsite" implementation (Or it can also be that the code base for the "Big Website" was unavailable to me .. imagine whatever floats your boat).


THE PROBLEM:

After I implemented my MVC Area project on dll called "MyTinyApp.Web.dll" for my "tiny microsite) upon trying to call the WebApi I started getting bellow error:



From the error it's clear that the routing got resolved without any issue. But Castle Windsor for some weird reason decided to step in like "hai .. new controller .. i need to resolve this" which I would be cool with until it couldn't and threw the bizarre error that doen't make sense to begin with. 

I have never told Castle Windsor to resolve any of my stuff for "MyTinyApp.Web.dll" and the exception was getting thrown from BigWebsite.Web.dll. 

WEIRD.


THE SOLUTION:

1. Create a processor in one of your project specific config file like below:


<pipelines>
      <initialize>
                               <processor patch:before="processor[@type='Sitecore.Mvc.Pipelines.Loader.InitializeGlobalFilters, Sitecore.Mvc']" type="MyTinyApp.CastleWindsor.Pipelines.Initialize.InitializeWindsorControllerFactory, MyTinyApp.CastleWindsor" />
     </initialize>

 </pipelines>

2. Create a settings to get the assembly name associated with Big Website's dependency resolver.

  <setting name="BigWebsiteDependancyResolverAssembly" value="BigWebsite.Web.DependencyResolution.ContainerManager,BigWebsite.Web" />

3. Implement the ControllerFactory for TinyApp:


public class InitializeWindsorControllerFactory
    {
        public virtual void Process(PipelineArgs args)
        {
            string assemblyAndClass = ConfigHelper.GetValue("BigWebsiteDependancyResolverAssembly");
                Type resolverType = Type.GetType(assemblyAndClass);
                IWindsorContainer icontainer = (IWindsorContainer)(resolverType.GetProperty("Container").GetValue(null));

                icontainer.Register(Classes.FromAssemblyNamed("oblog.client.mvc").BasedOn<IController>().LifestyleTransient());
        }

    }

And waalaaa .. Double Rainbow and Unicorn,



The trick here was to get it through reflection.

Thus I do not have to touch the BigWebsite codebase at all so I can avoid deployment headache for it. Resolving though reflection makes it completely independent to any other dlls.  

"This is mainly intended for future me." but seriously CastleWindsor WTF !!!!



UPDATE:



So one of my genius colleagues figured out that original implementation of ControllerFactory in BigWebsite.Web project(csproj) had flaw in it. 

Here's his post:


So it was originally like below:

public class WindsorControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
    {
        private readonly IKernel kernel;

        public WindsorControllerFactory(IKernel kernel)
        {
            this.kernel = kernel;
        }

        public override void ReleaseController(IController controller)
        {
            kernel.ReleaseComponent(controller);
        }

        protected override IController GetControllerInstance(RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType)
        {
            if (controllerType == null)
            {
                throw new HttpException(404, string.Format("The controller for path '{0}' could not be found.", requestContext.HttpContext.Request.Path));
            }

            return (IController)kernel.Resolve(controllerType);
        }

    }

Because of this line in the implementation of the ContainerManager class which you put in the initialize pipeline:
container.Install(FromAssembly.InDirectory(new AssemblyFilter(Path.GetDirectoryName(Uri.UnescapeDataString((new UriBuilder(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().CodeBase)).Path)), "BigWebsite*.dll")));
the described error was getting thrown from this line :  
return (IController)kernel.Resolve(controllerType);

Weirdly, most of the blog/tutorials show this example for implementing Castle Windsor for MVC.
The fix is to have this instead:
try
            {
                return (IController)kernel.Resolve(controllerType);
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                // do something
                return base.GetControllerInstance(requestContext, controllerType);

            }

And everything else works fine from here. No need to implement extra pipeline to inject you "mvc area" implementation dll into the pipeline or modify existing implementation.


Hope it helps someone facing the same issue save time so that he/she can utilize it properly to dress up like wookie.

  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Managing devices using Edge Manager

Managing edge devices has been a complex process as traditional IT ops tools fall short in distributed, low-connectivity environment to manage huge quantity of devices.  Red Hat Edge Manager  (Open source project: FlightControl , GA'd by Red Hat on late Jan, 2026) solves these challenges by providing streamlined management of edge devices and applications through a declarative approach . Now, there's a fair bit to unpack here. But for simplicity this is how I am going to map those 3 things here: Management of edge devices: I am mapping this to LCM (including upgrade, patch etc) of the underlying OS (in this case RHEL OS of BootC flavor or at least UBI based RHEL ). Managing applications: Mapping this to deploying applications and LCM of the applications stack on the OS. Declarative approach: This one is super interesting. To me this is very K8s-yy but in the world of edge devices running linux (RHEL OS, as of today). And then this thing also has MCP : This is my next prob...

Passwordless Auth to Azure Key Vault using External Secret and Workload Identity

I want to fetch my secrets from Azure KV and I don't want to use any password for it. Let's see how this can be implemented. This is yet another blog post (YABP) about ESO and Azure Workload Identity. Why Passwordless Auth: It is a common practice to use some sort of "master password" (spn clienid, clientsecret etc) to access Secret Vaults (in this case it is AZ KV) but that master password becomes a headache to manage (rotate, prevent leak etc). So, the passwordless auth to AKV is ideal.  Why ESO: This is discussed and addressed in the conclusion section. Workload Identity (Passwordless Auth): Lets make a backward start (just for a change). I will try to explain how the passwordless auth will work. This will make more sense when you will read through the detailed implementation section. Here's a sequence diagram to explain it: There's no magic here. This is a well documented process by microsoft  here . The below diagram (directly copied from the official doc...

The story of a Hack Job

"So, you have hacked it" -- Few days ago one of the guys at work passed me this comment on a random discussion about something I built. I paused for a moment and pondered: Do I reply defending how that's not a hack. OR Do I just not bother I picked the second option for 2 reasons: It was late. It probably isn't worth defending the "hack vs" topic as the comment passed was out of context. So I chose the next best action and replied "Yep, sure did and it is working great.". I felt like Batman in the moment. In this post I will rant about the knowledge gap around hacking and then describe about one of the components of my home automation project (really, this is the main reason for this post) and use that as an example how hacking is cool and does not always mean bad. But first lets align on my definition of hacking: People use this term in good and bad, both ways. For example: "He/she did a hack job" -- Yeah, that probably...

A modern cloud native (and self serve) way to manage Virtual Machines

Really!! Are there could native way to deploy, LCM VMs and add Self Serve on top ???? In this post I will describe an art of the possibility using the below tools: RHDH: Red Hat Developer Hub (Open source project: Backstage ) OCP Virtualization: Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization (Open source project: KubeVirt ) AAP: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (Open source project: Ansible / AWX ) RHEL BootC: Image mode for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (Open source project: bootc ) GitOps: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps (Open source project: ArgoCD ) Quay Registry or any other OCI compliant registry All of these projects can be run on Red Hat OpenShift (Open source project: OKD ) OR on other Kubernetes distribution or on VMs (you pick your underlying infra. For this post I have used OpenShift for simplicity of deployment, integrated tools and narrowly focusing on the usecases instead of the deployment of the tools).  The main goal here is to: Easily deploy and lifecycle applications and stuffs ...